“If you don’t have a digital first mindset in delivering your services, it’s hard to rejuvenate your customer base with younger cohorts because they demand the services,” Crone noted. “And if you’re on iOS, if you own an iPhone, you are one of the 2 billion users of an iPhone who demand to be able to do Apple Pay. So yes, it’s a threat to the financial institution that chose not to participate,” he added.

Shevlin says fintechs like challenger banks should feel threatened not only by Apple but by PayPal, Square and large banks.

“Take Chime for example, which gets held out as being this great example, even Chime has a niche market, which tends to be low to middle income consumers,” Shevlin said.

“It’s not a good base of consumers upon which to make a lot of money off of because they obviously don’t spend as much because they don’t have as much to spend and are not great lending prospects because their credit scores and creditworthiness is not as high as higher-income consumers. Without a broader strategy for monetizing those relationships, Chime and a lot of other fintechs are hurting,” he added.

The market is demonstrating these challenges right now – with the shutting down of Daylight, a fintech that served the LGBTQ community, layoffs at Aspiration, a climate-conscious neobank, and the sale of Kinly, a fintech focused on Black Americans, to Greenwood.

“The neobank/challenger banks are hitting a wall on growth, and obviously the funding to keep them alive is hard so, they should feel threatened by not just Apple, anybody out there with some presence in the market and strong financials,” Shevlin pointed out.